HR REPORT: Employment Law Hotline: Maternity Leave
Drummond Woodsum partners with the New Hampshire Municipal Association to provide a free Employment Law Hotline service, which provides general employment law advice to NHMA members. We receive a number of recurring inquiries through the hotline. The Q&A below is part of a running series in which we highlight frequently asked questions.
Question: The Town hired an employee five (5) months ago who is now asking for time off due to pregnancy. The Town policy states that an employee has to work for the Town for 12 months to qualify for FMLA. Does that mean that this employee has no access to protected leave after they exhaust their limited sick leave accrual?
Answer: While this employee likely does not qualify for protected leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), they may still be entitled to protected leave under New Hampshire’s maternity leave statute, RSA 354-A:7, VI(b).
First, the Town’s policy limiting FMLA is consistent with the law. While all public employers are “covered” employers and, therefore, must comply with the FMLA, only certain public employees are “eligible” to take protected FMLA leave. To be eligible for FMLA benefits and protections, an employee must: (1) have worked for the employer for at least 12 months over a seven (7) year look back period; (2) have actually worked 1,250 hours for the employer within 12 months of the request for leave; and (3) work at a location within 75 miles of at least 50 other employees. Additionally, to the extent an employee meets the first three eligibility criteria, to continue to be eligible, the employee also must not have already exhausted their allotment of FMLA leave (generally 12 weeks).
In order to definitively determine whether the hypothetical recent hire in this question is eligible for FMLA, you would need to determine whether:
- They had previously worked for the Town, and, if so, whether, in the aggregate, the employee had worked for at least 12 months over the prior 7 years. If the answer is no, the employee is not eligible for FMLA leave.
- If they did have 12 total months of employment with the Town during the seven (7) year lookback period (for example, a seasonal recreation employee who works 2 months each year), the focus then shifts to whether they had actually worked at least 1,250 hours for the Town within the prior 12 consecutive months. If the answer is no, the employee is not eligible for FMLA leave.
Additionally, the Town will need to determine whether the employee works within 75 miles of at least 50 other employees, which is determined by counting names on the payroll (including full-time, part-time, casual, and call employees). If the answer is no, then no Town employee would be eligible for federal FMLA leave.
Even if the employee is not eligible for FMLA leave, they are likely eligible for leave under the New Hampshire maternity leave law. The New Hampshire Law Against Discrimination, RSA 354-A:7, VI(b) entitles employees to “take leave of absence for the period of temporary physical disability resulting from pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions.” Employees who take advantage of this maternity leave provision are entitled to be returned to their original job or a comparable position when they are “physically able to return to work . . . unless business necessity makes this impossible or unreasonable.” The statute further specifies that “[f]or all other employment related purposes, including receipt of benefits under fringe benefit programs, pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions shall be considered temporary disabilities, and a female employee affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions shall be treated in the same manner as any employee affected by any other temporary disability.” RSA 354-A:7, VI(c)
The state maternity leave law applies to all employers with six (6) or more employees. Unlike the FMLA, there is no minimum period of employment required before an individual is eligible to take protected leave. There is also no limitation of the duration of the leave, other than the “period of physical disability.” While maternity leave typically lasts 6-8 weeks, employees may take leave for as long as their health provider determines that they are physically disabled. In order to determine if the employee’s pregnancy has become a disabling condition, an employer may (but is not required to) request documentation from the employee’s medical provider stating that the employee is physically disabled due to pregnancy. Many employers forego requesting medical information for leaves requested near the end of a “normal” pregnancy, but may choose to request documentation if leave is sought early in the pregnancy or for a period of time post-childbirth.
This is not a legal document nor is it intended to serve as legal advice or a legal opinion. Drummond Woodsum & MacMahon, P.A. makes no representations that this is a complete or final description or procedure that would ensure legal compliance and does not intend that the reader should rely on it as such.
March 09, 2023
Employment Law Review of the 2023 Legislative Session
February 09, 2023
HR REPORT: Employment Law Hotline: Maternity Leave
December 09, 2022
HR REPORT: NHMA Employment Law Hotline: Question and Answer Series
August 22, 2022
Forty Eight Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers
November 18, 2021
Drummond Woodsum Named Among Best Law Firms by Best Lawyers for 2022
November 15, 2021
Drummond Woodsum Grows to be the Second Largest Law Firm in Maine
September 10, 2021
Eight Attorneys Named to Best Lawyers 2022 “Lawyer of the Year”
August 19, 2021
Fifty Four Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers
August 01, 2021
HR REPORT: Show Me the Money: Vaccination Incentive Policies
January 15, 2021
HR REPORT: Sanbornize It!
November 01, 2020
HR REPORT: Surviving the Pandemic Together
September 01, 2020
HR Report: The Returning Workforce: To Mandate or Not to Mandate
July 20, 2020
HR REPORT: Workplace Safety in the COVID-19 Era
April 02, 2020
Payroll Tax Alert: New Benefits Under the CARES Act
March 26, 2020
Payroll Tax Alert: Families First Coronavirus Response Act
February 04, 2020
Drummond Woodsum Welcomes Steven Whitley as a New Shareholder
February 04, 2020
Drummond Woodsum Welcomes Leah Rachin as a New Shareholder
December 23, 2019
Drummond Woodsum Welcomes Attorney Huddy Grandy
November 11, 2019
New England Super Lawyers Recognizes 29 Drummond Woodsum Attorneys
October 09, 2019
New State Law Sharply Expands FMLA For New Hampshire Schools
October 03, 2019
Maine’s High Court Upholds Town Ownership of Beach in Kennebunk
June 01, 2019
HR Report: Workplace Violence
January 29, 2019
Drummond Woodsum Completes Merger with Gardner Fulton & Waugh
January 03, 2019
Local Government Deserves our Support
November 26, 2018
Attorney Keriann Roman Returns to Drummond Woodsum
November 14, 2018
Gardner, Fulton & Waugh to Merge with Drummond Woodsum
September 04, 2018
Agency Fees, Fair Share and the Janus Decision
August 16, 2018
Best Lawyers in America Recognizes 33 Drummond Woodsum Attorneys
August 09, 2018
Relevancy of the NLRA/NLRB to the NH Workplace
July 11, 2018
Do Your Job Titles Reflect Your Brand?
June 01, 2018
Are You Negotiating Ed Policy?
April 23, 2018
Superior Court issues final Ruling on Goose Rocks Beach Case
December 13, 2017
New Attorneys Join Drummond Woodsum
September 01, 2017
Drummond Woodsum is Among the 2017 Best Places to Work in Maine
March 21, 2017
Drummond Woodsum Hosts Conservation Law Foundation Seminar
January 15, 2015
Liability for Sidewalk Defects